This job view page is being replaced by Spyglass soon. Check out the new job view.
ResultFAILURE
Tests 46 failed / 160 succeeded
Started2022-07-22 11:32
Elapsed38m56s
Revision
Builderfafca5a5-09b1-11ed-82a1-eebf7615af1a
infra-commit16ae0286c
job-versionv1.25.0-alpha.3.76+8e14585d8700d9
kubetest-version
repok8s.io/kubernetes
repo-commit8e14585d8700d9cf7861be66943f023d11d41075
repos{u'k8s.io/kubernetes': u'master', u'github.com/containerd/containerd': u'main'}
revisionv1.25.0-alpha.3.76+8e14585d8700d9

Test Failures


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] Downward API should provide container's limits.cpu/memory and requests.cpu/memory as env vars [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 12s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sDownward\sAPI\sshould\sprovide\scontainer\'s\slimits\.cpu\/memory\sand\srequests\.cpu\/memory\sas\senv\svars\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x4d34a80?, {0x55cf155?, 0x5590968?}, 0xc000e27c00, 0x0, {0xc000971f48, 0x4, 0x4}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.testDownwardAPIUsingPod(...)
	test/e2e/common/node/downwardapi.go:421
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.testDownwardAPI(0x0?, {0xc001206ac0, 0x31}, {0xc000ac4140, 0x4, 0x4}, {0xc0000a5f48, 0x4, 0x4})
	test/e2e/common/node/downwardapi.go:417 +0x857
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func4.4()
	test/e2e/common/node/downwardapi.go:208 +0x36a
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] Hostname of Pod [NodeConformance] a pod without FQDN is not affected by SetHostnameAsFQDN field 1m56s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sHostname\sof\sPod\s\[NodeConformance\]\sa\spod\swithout\sFQDN\sis\snot\saffected\sby\sSetHostnameAsFQDN\sfield$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x558f186?, {0x55ab4b3?, 0xc00009ff68?}, 0xc000d3ac00, 0x0, {0xc0007b3f58, 0x1, 0x1}, 0xc0012639e0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e_node.glob..func39.2()
	test/e2e_node/pod_hostnamefqdn_test.go:103 +0x1ba
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] KubeletManagedEtcHosts should test kubelet managed /etc/hosts file [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 1m7s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sKubeletManagedEtcHosts\sshould\stest\skubelet\smanaged\s\/etc\/hosts\sfile\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/exec_util.go:105
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).ExecCommandInContainer(0x5f5e100?, {0x55d08b6, 0x15}, {0x55981f2, 0x9}, {0xc000ac4cc0?, 0x0?, 0x0?})
	test/e2e/framework/exec_util.go:105 +0x1af
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.(*KubeletManagedHostConfig).getFileContents(...)
	test/e2e/common/node/kubelet_etc_hosts.go:151
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.assertManagedStatus(0xc0004dd020, {0x55d08b6, 0x15}, 0x0, {0x55981f2, 0x9})
	test/e2e/common/node/kubelet_etc_hosts.go:116 +0x19b
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.(*KubeletManagedHostConfig).verifyEtcHosts(0x55b2677?)
	test/e2e/common/node/kubelet_etc_hosts.go:82 +0x12a
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func10.1()
	test/e2e/common/node/kubelet_etc_hosts.go:68 +0x65
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] MirrorPod when create a mirror pod should be recreated when mirror pod forcibly deleted [NodeConformance] 2m8s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sMirrorPod\swhen\screate\sa\smirror\spod\s\sshould\sbe\srecreated\swhen\smirror\spod\sforcibly\sdeleted\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_test.go:132
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e_node.glob..func33.1.4()
	test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_test.go:132 +0x349
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] MirrorPod when create a mirror pod should be updated when static pod updated [NodeConformance] 2m28s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sMirrorPod\swhen\screate\sa\smirror\spod\s\sshould\sbe\supdated\swhen\sstatic\spod\supdated\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_test.go:142
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e_node.glob..func33.1.5()
	test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_test.go:142 +0x196
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] MirrorPod when create a mirror pod without changes should successfully recreate when file is removed and recreated [NodeConformance] 2m48s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sMirrorPod\swhen\screate\sa\smirror\spod\swithout\schanges\s\sshould\ssuccessfully\srecreate\swhen\sfile\sis\sremoved\sand\srecreated\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_test.go:196
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e_node.glob..func33.2.2()
	test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_test.go:196 +0x946
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] MirrorPodWithGracePeriod when create a mirror pod mirror pod termination should satisfy grace period when static pod is deleted [NodeConformance] 3m23s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sMirrorPodWithGracePeriod\swhen\screate\sa\smirror\spod\s\smirror\spod\stermination\sshould\ssatisfy\sgrace\speriod\swhen\sstatic\spod\sis\sdeleted\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_grace_period_test.go:144
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e_node.glob..func32.1.5()
	test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_grace_period_test.go:144 +0x1b6
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] MirrorPodWithGracePeriod when create a mirror pod mirror pod termination should satisfy grace period when static pod is updated [NodeConformance] 4m31s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sMirrorPodWithGracePeriod\swhen\screate\sa\smirror\spod\s\smirror\spod\stermination\sshould\ssatisfy\sgrace\speriod\swhen\sstatic\spod\sis\supdated\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_grace_period_test.go:96
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e_node.glob..func32.1.3()
	test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_grace_period_test.go:96 +0x519
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] MirrorPodWithGracePeriod when create a mirror pod should update a static pod when the static pod is updated multiple times during the graceful termination period [NodeConformance] 4m38s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sMirrorPodWithGracePeriod\swhen\screate\sa\smirror\spod\s\sshould\supdate\sa\sstatic\spod\swhen\sthe\sstatic\spod\sis\supdated\smultiple\stimes\sduring\sthe\sgraceful\stermination\speriod\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_grace_period_test.go:125
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e_node.glob..func32.1.4()
	test/e2e_node/mirror_pod_grace_period_test.go:125 +0x4ee
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] Probing container should be restarted with a exec "cat /tmp/health" liveness probe [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m44s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sProbing\scontainer\sshould\sbe\srestarted\swith\sa\sexec\s\"cat\s\/tmp\/health\"\sliveness\sprobe\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/node/container_probe.go:140
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func2.4()
	test/e2e/common/node/container_probe.go:140 +0x166
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] Probing container should be restarted with an exec liveness probe with timeout [MinimumKubeletVersion:1.20] [NodeConformance] 4m30s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sProbing\scontainer\sshould\sbe\srestarted\swith\san\sexec\sliveness\sprobe\swith\stimeout\s\[MinimumKubeletVersion\:1\.20\]\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/node/container_probe.go:236
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func2.10()
	test/e2e/common/node/container_probe.go:236 +0x17a
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] Security Context When creating a pod with privileged should run the container as unprivileged when false [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 12s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sSecurity\sContext\sWhen\screating\sa\spod\swith\sprivileged\sshould\srun\sthe\scontainer\sas\sunprivileged\swhen\sfalse\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/internal/suite.go:596

				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] Security Context [NodeConformance][LinuxOnly] Container PID namespace sharing processes in containers sharing a pod namespace should be able to see each other 2.17s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sSecurity\sContext\s\[NodeConformance\]\[LinuxOnly\]\sContainer\sPID\snamespace\ssharing\sprocesses\sin\scontainers\ssharing\sa\spod\snamespace\sshould\sbe\sable\sto\ssee\seach\sother$'
test/e2e/framework/exec_util.go:105
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).ExecCommandInContainer(0x571a630?, {0x55d65dc, 0x16}, {0x55b4e87, 0x10}, {0xc000c12ac0?, 0x7f299c049ca0?, 0x18?})
	test/e2e/framework/exec_util.go:105 +0x1af
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e_node.glob..func49.2.2()
	test/e2e_node/security_context_test.go:98 +0x53f
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] Security Context when creating containers with AllowPrivilegeEscalation should not allow privilege escalation when false [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 38s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sSecurity\sContext\swhen\screating\scontainers\swith\sAllowPrivilegeEscalation\sshould\snot\sallow\sprivilege\sescalation\swhen\sfalse\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/internal/suite.go:596

				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] Summary API [NodeConformance] when querying /stats/summary should report resource usage through the stats api 3m27s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sSummary\sAPI\s\[NodeConformance\]\swhen\squerying\s\/stats\/summary\sshould\sreport\sresource\susage\sthrough\sthe\sstats\sapi$'
test/e2e_node/summary_test.go:330
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e_node.glob..func50.1.2()
	test/e2e_node/summary_test.go:330 +0xf0cc
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-node] Sysctls [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] should support sysctls with slashes as separator [MinimumKubeletVersion:1.23] 24s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-node\]\sSysctls\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\sshould\ssupport\ssysctls\swith\sslashes\sas\sseparator\s\[MinimumKubeletVersion\:1\.23\]$'
test/e2e/common/node/sysctl.go:228
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/node.glob..func22.7()
	test/e2e/common/node/sysctl.go:228 +0x449
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] ConfigMap should be consumable from pods in volume with mappings [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 26s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sConfigMap\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sfrom\spods\sin\svolume\swith\smappings\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x473bcc0?, {0x55bd9c1?, 0x2?}, 0xc000cb7400, 0x0, {0xc000ee4a40, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x3e?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doConfigMapE2EWithMappings(0xc0009734a0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
	test/e2e/common/storage/configmap_volume.go:676 +0x6c5
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func1.6()
	test/e2e/common/storage/configmap_volume.go:89 +0x25
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] ConfigMap should be consumable from pods in volume with mappings as non-root [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 6.15s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sConfigMap\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sfrom\spods\sin\svolume\swith\smappings\sas\snon\-root\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x473bcc0?, {0x55bd9c1?, 0x2?}, 0xc0008b9000, 0x0, {0xc00118b5a0, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x3e?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doConfigMapE2EWithMappings(0xc000c5fe40, 0x1, 0x0, 0x0)
	test/e2e/common/storage/configmap_volume.go:676 +0x6c5
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func1.8()
	test/e2e/common/storage/configmap_volume.go:109 +0x26
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] ConfigMap should be consumable in multiple volumes in the same pod [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 28s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sConfigMap\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sin\smultiple\svolumes\sin\sthe\ssame\spod\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x559406d?, {0x55bd9c1?, 0xc00126ff58?}, 0xc000d56000, 0x0, {0xc00126ff18, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func1.13()
	test/e2e/common/storage/configmap_volume.go:488 +0x8c5
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Downward API volume should provide container's cpu request [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 44s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sDownward\sAPI\svolume\sshould\sprovide\scontainer\'s\scpu\srequest\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x558b03a?, {0x55ee7e5?, 0x0?}, 0xc0007dfc00, 0x0, {0xc000a85f78, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func3.11()
	test/e2e/common/storage/downwardapi_volume.go:224 +0xaf
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Downward API volume should provide container's memory limit [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 28s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sDownward\sAPI\svolume\sshould\sprovide\scontainer\'s\smemory\slimit\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x5596e0c?, {0x55ee7e5?, 0x0?}, 0xc000cda800, 0x0, {0xc000f97f78, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func3.10()
	test/e2e/common/storage/downwardapi_volume.go:210 +0xaf
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Downward API volume should provide podname only [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 24s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sDownward\sAPI\svolume\sshould\sprovide\spodname\sonly\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x558b6a6?, {0x55ee7e5?, 0xc000c0b768?}, 0xc000dca000, 0x0, {0xc000f97f78, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func3.2()
	test/e2e/common/storage/downwardapi_volume.go:56 +0xf9
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] EmptyDir volumes should support (non-root,0644,default) [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 50s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sEmptyDir\svolumes\sshould\ssupport\s\(non\-root\,0644\,default\)\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x55c3780?, {0xc001444660?, 0xc00009fee8?}, 0xc000d63c00, 0x0, {0xc000f93f18, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doTest0644(0x10360a0?, 0x1a61752?, {0x0, 0x0})
	test/e2e/common/storage/empty_dir.go:526 +0x52b
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func4.13()
	test/e2e/common/storage/empty_dir.go:197 +0x28
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] EmptyDir volumes should support (non-root,0666,default) [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 40s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sEmptyDir\svolumes\sshould\ssupport\s\(non\-root\,0666\,default\)\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x55c3793?, {0xc000e8cf90?, 0xc0000a4ee8?}, 0xc000cf2000, 0x0, {0xc000987f18, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doTest0666(0xc0004ded40?, 0x1a61752?, {0x0, 0x0})
	test/e2e/common/storage/empty_dir.go:551 +0x52b
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func4.14()
	test/e2e/common/storage/empty_dir.go:207 +0x28
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] EmptyDir volumes should support (root,0666,default) [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 6.10s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sEmptyDir\svolumes\sshould\ssupport\s\(root\,0666\,default\)\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x55c3793?, {0xc00112ede0?, 0xc0000a5ee8?}, 0xc000be3800, 0x0, {0xc00134bf18, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doTest0666(0x10360a0?, 0xc0012183c0?, {0x0, 0x0})
	test/e2e/common/storage/empty_dir.go:551 +0x52b
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func4.11()
	test/e2e/common/storage/empty_dir.go:177 +0x25
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] EmptyDir volumes should support (root,0666,tmpfs) [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 34s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sEmptyDir\svolumes\sshould\ssupport\s\(root\,0666\,tmpfs\)\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x473bcc0?, {0xc000e76468?, 0xc0000a5ee8?}, 0xc000dec400, 0x0, {0xc000f0b500, 0x3, 0x4}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doTest0666(0x0?, 0x1a61752?, {0x558f87c, 0x6})
	test/e2e/common/storage/empty_dir.go:551 +0x52b
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func4.4()
	test/e2e/common/storage/empty_dir.go:107 +0x2b
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] EmptyDir volumes should support (root,0777,default) [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 8.11s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sEmptyDir\svolumes\sshould\ssupport\s\(root\,0777\,default\)\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x55c37a6?, {0xc0009f1710?, 0xc0000a5ee8?}, 0xc0009f2800, 0x0, {0xc000b15f18, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doTest0777(0x6e6961746e6f6322?, 0x1a61752?, {0x0, 0x0})
	test/e2e/common/storage/empty_dir.go:576 +0x52b
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func4.12()
	test/e2e/common/storage/empty_dir.go:187 +0x25
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] HostPath should give a volume the correct mode [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] 18s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sHostPath\sshould\sgive\sa\svolume\sthe\scorrect\smode\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x55a7bef?, {0x55a66cd?, 0xc0008e0f58?}, 0xc000d4f400, 0x0, {0xc000efdf78, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func5.2()
	test/e2e/common/storage/host_path.go:61 +0x251
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] HostPath should support r/w [NodeConformance] 20s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sHostPath\sshould\ssupport\sr\/w\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x55ac0aa?, {0x55a28d1?, 0xc00124ff58?}, 0xc000f25800, 0x1, {0xc000f93f28, 0x1, 0x1}, 0xc000094800?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func5.3()
	test/e2e/common/storage/host_path.go:90 +0x505
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected combined should project all components that make up the projection API [Projection][NodeConformance] [Conformance] 6.09s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\scombined\sshould\sproject\sall\scomponents\sthat\smake\sup\sthe\sprojection\sAPI\s\[Projection\]\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x559406d?, {0x568f699?, 0xc000f99f58?}, 0xc000d51000, 0x0, {0xc000f99f28, 0x3, 0x3}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func6.1()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_combined.go:91 +0xc77
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected configMap should be consumable from pods in volume with defaultMode set [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 46s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\sconfigMap\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sfrom\spods\sin\svolume\swith\sdefaultMode\sset\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x563effa?, {0x55bd9c1?, 0x2?}, 0xc000c2a800, 0x0, {0xc0008b3f10, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x44?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doProjectedConfigMapE2EWithoutMappings(0xc0008d3340, 0x0, 0x0, 0xc000dcb610)
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_configmap.go:515 +0x55e
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func7.2()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_configmap.go:58 +0x45
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected configMap should be consumable from pods in volume with mappings [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 48s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\sconfigMap\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sfrom\spods\sin\svolume\swith\smappings\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x473bcc0?, {0x55bd9c1?, 0x2?}, 0xc000e47400, 0x0, {0xc000401120, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x48?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doProjectedConfigMapE2EWithMappings(0xc000bacdc0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0)
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_configmap.go:566 +0x685
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func7.6()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_configmap.go:89 +0x25
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected configMap should be consumable in multiple volumes in the same pod [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 1m12s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\sconfigMap\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sin\smultiple\svolumes\sin\sthe\ssame\spod\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x559406d?, {0x55bd9c1?, 0xc001367f58?}, 0xc000d32c00, 0x0, {0xc001367f18, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func7.12()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_configmap.go:453 +0x9e5
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected downwardAPI should provide container's cpu limit [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 10s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\sdownwardAPI\sshould\sprovide\scontainer\'s\scpu\slimit\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x558b048?, {0x55ee7e5?, 0x0?}, 0xc000de6800, 0x0, {0xc000f93f78, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func8.9()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_downwardapi.go:196 +0xaf
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected downwardAPI should provide container's memory request [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 40s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\sdownwardAPI\sshould\sprovide\scontainer\'s\smemory\srequest\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x5596dfa?, {0x55ee7e5?, 0x0?}, 0xc000a5d800, 0x0, {0xc0008b3f78, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func8.12()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_downwardapi.go:238 +0xaf
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected downwardAPI should set mode on item file [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 12s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\sdownwardAPI\sshould\sset\smode\son\sitem\sfile\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0xc00057fe80?, {0x55ee7e5?, 0x55c597c?}, 0xc000cfa000, 0x0, {0xc000f3ff78, 0x1, 0x1}, 0x100000001?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutput(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:581
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func8.4()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_downwardapi.go:88 +0xc7
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected secret should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace [NodeConformance] 1m36s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\ssecret\sshould\sbe\sable\sto\smount\sin\sa\svolume\sregardless\sof\sa\sdifferent\ssecret\sexisting\swith\ssame\sname\sin\sdifferent\snamespace\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x562a664?, {0x55ae981?, 0xc000681e30?}, 0xc000ddf800, 0x0, {0xc000681df0, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doProjectedSecretE2EWithoutMapping(0xc000cea160, 0x0, {0xc0009221c0, 0x3a}, 0x0, 0x0)
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_secret.go:507 +0xa4b
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func9.6()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_secret.go:110 +0x5c5
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected secret should be consumable from pods in volume with mappings and Item Mode set [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 38s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\ssecret\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sfrom\spods\sin\svolume\swith\smappings\sand\sItem\sMode\sset\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x566a1d5?, {0x55ae981?, 0xc000f93f30?}, 0xc000dfb000, 0x0, {0xc000f93ef0, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doProjectedSecretE2EWithMapping(0xc000c42160, 0xc001029490)
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_secret.go:584 +0xa15
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func9.5()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_secret.go:89 +0x3c
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Projected secret should be consumable in multiple volumes in a pod [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 14s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sProjected\ssecret\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sin\smultiple\svolumes\sin\sa\spod\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x562a664?, {0x55ae981?, 0xc0008dbf58?}, 0xc000cd7000, 0x0, {0xc0008dbf18, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func9.7()
	test/e2e/common/storage/projected_secret.go:203 +0xa95
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Secrets should be able to mount in a volume regardless of a different secret existing with same name in different namespace [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 1m12s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sSecrets\sshould\sbe\sable\sto\smount\sin\sa\svolume\sregardless\sof\sa\sdifferent\ssecret\sexisting\swith\ssame\sname\sin\sdifferent\snamespace\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x55e3f0a?, {0x55ae981?, 0xc001639e30?}, 0xc000f25400, 0x0, {0xc001639df0, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doSecretE2EWithoutMapping(0xc000c422c0, 0x0, {0xc000c1d230, 0x30}, 0x0, 0x0)
	test/e2e/common/storage/secrets_volume.go:537 +0x9cb
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func10.6()
	test/e2e/common/storage/secrets_volume.go:116 +0x5c5
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Secrets should be consumable from pods in volume [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 32s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sSecrets\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sfrom\spods\sin\svolume\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x55e3f0a?, {0x55ae981?, 0xc000f93f10?}, 0xc000dfa000, 0x0, {0xc000f93ed0, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doSecretE2EWithoutMapping(0xc000c422c0, 0x0, {0xc00161cff0, 0x30}, 0x0, 0x0)
	test/e2e/common/storage/secrets_volume.go:537 +0x9cb
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func10.1()
	test/e2e/common/storage/secrets_volume.go:47 +0x55
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Secrets should be consumable from pods in volume as non-root with defaultMode and fsGroup set [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 10s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sSecrets\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sfrom\spods\sin\svolume\sas\snon\-root\swith\sdefaultMode\sand\sfsGroup\sset\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x55e3f0a?, {0x55ae981?, 0xc000f93f00?}, 0xc000de0800, 0x0, {0xc000f93ec0, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doSecretE2EWithoutMapping(0xc000c422c0, 0xc0014142b0, {0xc0012ba6f0, 0x30}, 0xc0014142b8, 0x8c2f160)
	test/e2e/common/storage/secrets_volume.go:537 +0x9cb
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func10.3()
	test/e2e/common/storage/secrets_volume.go:70 +0x90
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_cos-stable01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


E2eNode Suite [It] [sig-storage] Secrets should be consumable from pods in volume with mappings [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 4.08s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=E2eNode\sSuite\s\[It\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sSecrets\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sfrom\spods\sin\svolume\swith\smappings\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/util.go:772
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).testContainerOutputMatcher(0x56233b0?, {0x55ae981?, 0xc0003e1f38?}, 0xc000ddf000, 0x0, {0xc0003e1ef8, 0x2, 0x2}, 0x0?)
	test/e2e/framework/util.go:772 +0x176
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework.(*Framework).TestContainerOutputRegexp(...)
	test/e2e/framework/framework.go:588
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.doSecretE2EWithMapping(0xc000cea2c0, 0x0)
	test/e2e/common/storage/secrets_volume.go:605 +0x985
k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/common/storage.glob..func10.4()
	test/e2e/common/storage/secrets_volume.go:79 +0x1f