This job view page is being replaced by Spyglass soon. Check out the new job view.
ResultFAILURE
Tests 19 failed / 295 succeeded
Started2021-12-03 02:08
Elapsed1h36m
Revisionmaster
control_plane_node_os_imagecos-85-13310-1308-1
job-versionv1.23.0-rc.0.9+93fb324dce69cd
kubetest-version
revisionv1.23.0-rc.0.9+93fb324dce69cd
worker_node_os_imagecos-85-13310-1308-1

Test Failures


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-api-machinery] Aggregator Should be able to support the 1.17 Sample API Server using the current Aggregator [Conformance] 6m37s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-api\-machinery\]\sAggregator\sShould\sbe\sable\sto\ssupport\sthe\s1\.17\sSample\sAPI\sServer\susing\sthe\scurrent\sAggregator\s\[Conformance\]$'
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:630
Dec  3 03:11:06.795: deploying extension apiserver in namespace aggregator-9880
Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc00096d790>: {
        s: "error waiting for deployment \"sample-apiserver-deployment\" status to match expectation: deployment status: v1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1.DeploymentCondition{v1.DeploymentCondition{Type:\"Available\", Status:\"False\", LastUpdateTime:time.Date(2021, time.December, 3, 3, 6, 6, 0, time.Local), LastTransitionTime:time.Date(2021, time.December, 3, 3, 6, 6, 0, time.Local), Reason:\"MinimumReplicasUnavailable\", Message:\"Deployment does not have minimum availability.\"}, v1.DeploymentCondition{Type:\"Progressing\", Status:\"True\", LastUpdateTime:time.Date(2021, time.December, 3, 3, 6, 6, 0, time.Local), LastTransitionTime:time.Date(2021, time.December, 3, 3, 6, 6, 0, time.Local), Reason:\"ReplicaSetUpdated\", Message:\"ReplicaSet \\\"sample-apiserver-deployment-7fcf56588\\\" is progressing.\"}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}",
    }
    error waiting for deployment "sample-apiserver-deployment" status to match expectation: deployment status: v1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1.DeploymentCondition{v1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"False", LastUpdateTime:time.Date(2021, time.December, 3, 3, 6, 6, 0, time.Local), LastTransitionTime:time.Date(2021, time.December, 3, 3, 6, 6, 0, time.Local), Reason:"MinimumReplicasUnavailable", Message:"Deployment does not have minimum availability."}, v1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Progressing", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:time.Date(2021, time.December, 3, 3, 6, 6, 0, time.Local), LastTransitionTime:time.Date(2021, time.December, 3, 3, 6, 6, 0, time.Local), Reason:"ReplicaSetUpdated", Message:"ReplicaSet \"sample-apiserver-deployment-7fcf56588\" is progressing."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
occurred
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apimachinery/aggregator.go:320
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_06.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-apps] ReplicaSet Replicaset should have a working scale subresource [Conformance] 6m11s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-apps\]\sReplicaSet\sReplicaset\sshould\shave\sa\sworking\sscale\ssubresource\s\[Conformance\]$'
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:630
Dec  3 02:57:41.728: error in waiting for pods to come up: failed to wait for pods running: [timed out waiting for the condition]
Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc0043ec7e0>: {
        s: "failed to wait for pods running: [timed out waiting for the condition]",
    }
    failed to wait for pods running: [timed out waiting for the condition]
occurred
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/apps/replica_set.go:423
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_08.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-cli] Kubectl client Update Demo should scale a replication controller [Conformance] 5m10s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-cli\]\sKubectl\sclient\sUpdate\sDemo\sshould\sscale\sa\sreplication\scontroller\s\s\[Conformance\]$'
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:630
Dec  3 03:12:47.436: Timed out after 300 seconds waiting for name=update-demo pods to reach valid state
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/kubectl/kubectl.go:327
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_02.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-network] Proxy version v1 A set of valid responses are returned for both pod and service ProxyWithPath [Conformance] 1m30s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-network\]\sProxy\sversion\sv1\sA\sset\sof\svalid\sresponses\sare\sreturned\sfor\sboth\spod\sand\sservice\sProxyWithPath\s\[Conformance\]$'
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:630
Dec  3 03:05:12.962: Pod didn't start within time out period
Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc0002d0280>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
occurred
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/proxy.go:314
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-network] Proxy version v1 should proxy through a service and a pod [Conformance] 5m15s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-network\]\sProxy\sversion\sv1\sshould\sproxy\sthrough\sa\sservice\sand\sa\spod\s\s\[Conformance\]$'
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:630
Dec  3 03:12:42.851: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc003a9e890>: {
        s: "only 0 pods started out of 1",
    }
    only 0 pods started out of 1
occurred
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/network/proxy.go:179
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_04.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-node] ConfigMap should be consumable via environment variable [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 6m15s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-node\]\sConfigMap\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\svia\senvironment\svariable\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:630
Dec  3 03:12:34.789: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc005118620>: {
        s: "expected pod \"pod-configmaps-91097ca5-f224-40eb-aab9-06bb255ad76a\" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod \"pod-configmaps-91097ca5-f224-40eb-aab9-06bb255ad76a\" to be \"Succeeded or Failed\"",
    }
    expected pod "pod-configmaps-91097ca5-f224-40eb-aab9-06bb255ad76a" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod "pod-configmaps-91097ca5-f224-40eb-aab9-06bb255ad76a" to be "Succeeded or Failed"
occurred
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/util.go:743
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_08.xml

Find pod-configmaps-91097ca5-f224-40eb-aab9-06bb255ad76a mentions in log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-storage] Downward API volume should provide container's cpu limit [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m18s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-storage\]\sDownward\sAPI\svolume\sshould\sprovide\scontainer\'s\scpu\slimit\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/framework.go:630
Dec  3 03:05:54.643: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc003c8cb90>: {
        s: "expected pod \"downwardapi-volume-6aee3eae-a931-49d7-830d-63725c09c0cf\" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod \"downwardapi-volume-6aee3eae-a931-49d7-830d-63725c09c0cf\" to be \"Succeeded or Failed\"",
    }
    expected pod "downwardapi-volume-6aee3eae-a931-49d7-830d-63725c09c0cf" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod "downwardapi-volume-6aee3eae-a931-49d7-830d-63725c09c0cf" to be "Succeeded or Failed"
occurred
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/util.go:743
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_03.xml

Find downwardapi-volume-6aee3eae-a931-49d7-830d-63725c09c0cf mentions in log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: windows-gcepd] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (ntfs)][Feature:Windows] subPath should support existing directories when readOnly specified in the volumeSource 5m3s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-storage\]\sIn\-tree\sVolumes\s\[Driver\:\swindows\-gcepd\]\s\[Testpattern\:\sDynamic\sPV\s\(ntfs\)\]\[Feature\:Windows\]\ssubPath\sshould\ssupport\sexisting\sdirectories\swhen\sreadOnly\sspecified\sin\sthe\svolumeSource$'
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/testsuites/subpath.go:395
Dec  3 03:34:31.441: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc003725320>: {
        s: "expected pod \"pod-subpath-test-dynamicpv-tffs\" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod \"pod-subpath-test-dynamicpv-tffs\" to be \"Succeeded or Failed\"",
    }
    expected pod "pod-subpath-test-dynamicpv-tffs" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod "pod-subpath-test-dynamicpv-tffs" to be "Succeeded or Failed"
occurred
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/util.go:743
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_01.xml

Find pod-subpath-test-dynamicpv-tffs mentions in log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-storage] In-tree Volumes [Driver: windows-gcepd] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (ntfs)][Feature:Windows] subPath should support existing directory 5m8s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-storage\]\sIn\-tree\sVolumes\s\[Driver\:\swindows\-gcepd\]\s\[Testpattern\:\sDynamic\sPV\s\(ntfs\)\]\[Feature\:Windows\]\ssubPath\sshould\ssupport\sexisting\sdirectory$'
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/storage/testsuites/subpath.go:205
Dec  3 03:27:07.967: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc003a05bb0>: {
        s: "expected pod \"pod-subpath-test-dynamicpv-wpls\" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod \"pod-subpath-test-dynamicpv-wpls\" to be \"Succeeded or Failed\"",
    }
    expected pod "pod-subpath-test-dynamicpv-wpls" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod "pod-subpath-test-dynamicpv-wpls" to be "Succeeded or Failed"
occurred
/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/_output/dockerized/go/src/k8s.io/kubernetes/test/e2e/framework/util.go:743
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_08.xml

Find pod-subpath-test-dynamicpv-wpls mentions in log files | View