This job view page is being replaced by Spyglass soon. Check out the new job view.
PRricky1993: Deployment controller clean old rs by revision
ResultSUCCESS
Tests 4 failed / 762 succeeded
Started2019-09-18 06:52
Elapsed1h5m
Revision
Buildergke-prow-ssd-pool-1a225945-hwdp
Refs master:57d87502
82783:cfa011a2
podd2a3acc8-d9e0-11e9-8bc7-e24267b974c4
infra-commit6dc9fbe41
job-versionv1.17.0-alpha.0.1521+98b6f3a32131af
master_os_imagecos-73-11647-163-0
node_os_imagecos-73-11647-163-0
podd2a3acc8-d9e0-11e9-8bc7-e24267b974c4
repok8s.io/kubernetes
repo-commit98b6f3a32131af6ee447bd31ef9b6d8e2b6023d1
repos{u'k8s.io/kubernetes': u'master:57d87502ba6408e708e3000615bfdfd3db5dbed1,82783:cfa011a22605e92187971a5fc8c84633af1ba13d', u'k8s.io/release': u'master'}
revisionv1.17.0-alpha.0.1521+98b6f3a32131af

Test Failures


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-cli] Kubectl Port forwarding With a server listening on 0.0.0.0 that expects a client request should support a client that connects, sends DATA, and disconnects 1m11s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-cli\]\sKubectl\sPort\sforwarding\sWith\sa\sserver\slistening\son\s0\.0\.0\.0\sthat\sexpects\sa\sclient\srequest\sshould\ssupport\sa\sclient\sthat\sconnects\,\ssends\sDATA\,\sand\sdisconnects$'
test/e2e/kubectl/portforward.go:445
Sep 18 07:12:42.308: Expected "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" from server, got "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
test/e2e/kubectl/portforward.go:331
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_06.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-network] Services should be able to switch session affinity for NodePort service 2m34s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-network\]\sServices\sshould\sbe\sable\sto\sswitch\ssession\saffinity\sfor\sNodePort\sservice$'
test/e2e/network/service.go:1807
Sep 18 07:25:06.023: Affinity should hold but didn't.
test/e2e/framework/service/affinity_checker.go:113
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_29.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-storage] CSI Volumes [Driver: csi-hostpath] [Testpattern: Dynamic PV (block volmode)] volumeMode should not mount / map unused volumes in a pod 5m34s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-storage\]\sCSI\sVolumes\s\[Driver\:\scsi\-hostpath\]\s\[Testpattern\:\sDynamic\sPV\s\(block\svolmode\)\]\svolumeMode\sshould\snot\smount\s\/\smap\sunused\svolumes\sin\sa\spod$'
test/e2e/storage/testsuites/volumemode.go:322
Sep 18 07:33:25.984: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc00300ca50>: {
        s: "PersistentVolumeClaims [csi-hostpath56klr] not all in phase Bound within 5m0s",
    }
    PersistentVolumeClaims [csi-hostpath56klr] not all in phase Bound within 5m0s
occurred
test/e2e/storage/testsuites/base.go:365
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_06.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-storage] CSI Volumes [Driver: csi-hostpath] [Testpattern: inline ephemeral CSI volume] ephemeral should support multiple inline ephemeral volumes 15m26s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-storage\]\sCSI\sVolumes\s\[Driver\:\scsi\-hostpath\]\s\[Testpattern\:\sinline\sephemeral\sCSI\svolume\]\sephemeral\sshould\ssupport\smultiple\sinline\sephemeral\svolumes$'
test/e2e/storage/testsuites/ephemeral.go:177
Sep 18 07:43:47.016: waiting for pod with inline volume
Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc0000a2080>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
occurred
test/e2e/storage/testsuites/ephemeral.go:259
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_19.xml

Find with mentions in log files | View test history on testgrid


Show 762 Passed Tests

Show 4149 Skipped Tests