This job view page is being replaced by Spyglass soon. Check out the new job view.
PRmortent: Promote PodDisruptionBudget to policy/v1
ResultFAILURE
Tests 72 failed / 424 succeeded
Started2021-02-22 04:09
Elapsed1h15m
Revision4eaccf468effc5f8b606960bf48f0c93e20331fc
Refs 99290

Test Failures


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] Container Lifecycle Hook when create a pod with lifecycle hook should execute poststart exec hook properly [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m3s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\sContainer\sLifecycle\sHook\swhen\screate\sa\spod\swith\slifecycle\shook\sshould\sexecute\spoststart\sexec\shook\sproperly\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/lifecycle_hook.go:52
Feb 22 04:44:47.749: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc0002b2240>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
occurred
test/e2e/framework/pods.go:103
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_08.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] InitContainer [NodeConformance] should not start app containers and fail the pod if init containers fail on a RestartNever pod [Conformance] 5m2s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\sInitContainer\s\[NodeConformance\]\sshould\snot\sstart\sapp\scontainers\sand\sfail\sthe\spod\sif\sinit\scontainers\sfail\son\sa\sRestartNever\spod\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/framework.go:640
Feb 22 04:49:52.808: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc0002b2240>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
occurred
test/e2e/common/init_container.go:547
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_08.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] Pods should run through the lifecycle of Pods and PodStatus [Conformance] 2m2s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\sPods\sshould\srun\sthrough\sthe\slifecycle\sof\sPods\sand\sPodStatus\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/framework.go:640
Feb 22 04:35:18.393: failed to see Pod pod-test in namespace pods-5861 running
Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc00023e240>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
occurred
test/e2e/common/pods.go:952
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_07.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] Probing container should *not* be restarted with a /healthz http liveness probe [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m1s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\sProbing\scontainer\sshould\s\*not\*\sbe\srestarted\swith\sa\s\/healthz\shttp\sliveness\sprobe\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/framework.go:640
Feb 22 04:54:14.903: starting pod test-webserver-b9d28096-c5a3-451f-aa54-8753d8f45597 in namespace container-probe-8574
Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc000238230>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
occurred
test/e2e/common/container_probe.go:592
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_18.xml

Find test-webserver-b9d28096-c5a3-451f-aa54-8753d8f45597 mentions in log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] Security Context When creating a pod with readOnlyRootFilesystem should run the container with readonly rootfs when readOnlyRootFilesystem=true [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] 5m3s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\sSecurity\sContext\sWhen\screating\sa\spod\swith\sreadOnlyRootFilesystem\sshould\srun\sthe\scontainer\swith\sreadonly\srootfs\swhen\sreadOnlyRootFilesystem\=true\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]$'
test/e2e/common/security_context.go:212
Feb 22 05:05:06.989: wait for pod "busybox-readonly-true-7194f39a-549e-47f6-b747-d0093ac856f2" to fail
Expected success, but got an error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc002c7fbe0>: {
        s: "Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod \"busybox-readonly-true-7194f39a-549e-47f6-b747-d0093ac856f2\" to be \"Succeeded or Failed\"",
    }
    Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod "busybox-readonly-true-7194f39a-549e-47f6-b747-d0093ac856f2" to be "Succeeded or Failed"
test/e2e/common/security_context.go:385
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_05.xml

Find busybox-readonly-true-7194f39a-549e-47f6-b747-d0093ac856f2 mentions in log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] Variable Expansion should allow substituting values in a container's args [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m5s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\sVariable\sExpansion\sshould\sallow\ssubstituting\svalues\sin\sa\scontainer\'s\sargs\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/framework.go:640
Feb 22 04:38:24.228: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc002e520e0>: {
        s: "expected pod \"var-expansion-dfad5d0e-ac87-4ce2-8d8a-32c70767b31c\" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod \"var-expansion-dfad5d0e-ac87-4ce2-8d8a-32c70767b31c\" to be \"Succeeded or Failed\"",
    }
    expected pod "var-expansion-dfad5d0e-ac87-4ce2-8d8a-32c70767b31c" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod "var-expansion-dfad5d0e-ac87-4ce2-8d8a-32c70767b31c" to be "Succeeded or Failed"
occurred
test/e2e/framework/util.go:742
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_13.xml

Find var-expansion-dfad5d0e-ac87-4ce2-8d8a-32c70767b31c mentions in log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] [sig-network] Networking Granular Checks: Pods should function for node-pod communication: http [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m26s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\s\[sig\-network\]\sNetworking\sGranular\sChecks\:\sPods\sshould\sfunction\sfor\snode\-pod\scommunication\:\shttp\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/framework.go:640
Feb 22 04:48:59.887: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc000238230>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
occurred
test/e2e/framework/network/utils.go:695
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_18.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] [sig-storage] ConfigMap optional updates should be reflected in volume [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m4s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sConfigMap\soptional\supdates\sshould\sbe\sreflected\sin\svolume\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/framework.go:640
Feb 22 05:05:11.051: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc00023e240>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
occurred
test/e2e/framework/pods.go:103
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_22.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] [sig-storage] ConfigMap updates should be reflected in volume [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m1s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sConfigMap\supdates\sshould\sbe\sreflected\sin\svolume\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/framework.go:640
Feb 22 04:50:11.538: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc00023e240>: {
        s: "timed out waiting for the condition",
    }
    timed out waiting for the condition
occurred
test/e2e/framework/pods.go:103
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_02.xml

Filter through log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] [sig-storage] Downward API volume should provide container's memory request [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m8s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sDownward\sAPI\svolume\sshould\sprovide\scontainer\'s\smemory\srequest\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/framework.go:640
Feb 22 04:44:44.669: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc001ca9240>: {
        s: "expected pod \"downwardapi-volume-20258be7-1248-4fd1-822e-b93055616a7f\" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod \"downwardapi-volume-20258be7-1248-4fd1-822e-b93055616a7f\" to be \"Succeeded or Failed\"",
    }
    expected pod "downwardapi-volume-20258be7-1248-4fd1-822e-b93055616a7f" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod "downwardapi-volume-20258be7-1248-4fd1-822e-b93055616a7f" to be "Succeeded or Failed"
occurred
test/e2e/framework/util.go:742
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_22.xml

Find downwardapi-volume-20258be7-1248-4fd1-822e-b93055616a7f mentions in log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] [sig-storage] EmptyDir volumes should support (root,0644,default) [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m7s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sEmptyDir\svolumes\sshould\ssupport\s\(root\,0644\,default\)\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/framework.go:640
Feb 22 04:50:34.027: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc003d9ce80>: {
        s: "expected pod \"pod-052d9079-9e62-486f-8f41-ee4ddc2e8faa\" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod \"pod-052d9079-9e62-486f-8f41-ee4ddc2e8faa\" to be \"Succeeded or Failed\"",
    }
    expected pod "pod-052d9079-9e62-486f-8f41-ee4ddc2e8faa" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod "pod-052d9079-9e62-486f-8f41-ee4ddc2e8faa" to be "Succeeded or Failed"
occurred
test/e2e/framework/util.go:742
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_10.xml

Find pod-052d9079-9e62-486f-8f41-ee4ddc2e8faa mentions in log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [k8s.io] [sig-storage] Secrets should be consumable from pods in volume with mappings and Item Mode set [LinuxOnly] [NodeConformance] [Conformance] 5m6s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[k8s\.io\]\s\[sig\-storage\]\sSecrets\sshould\sbe\sconsumable\sfrom\spods\sin\svolume\swith\smappings\sand\sItem\sMode\sset\s\[LinuxOnly\]\s\[NodeConformance\]\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/framework/framework.go:640
Feb 22 04:49:22.993: Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc001ac0d20>: {
        s: "expected pod \"pod-secrets-8fb73bbf-1718-4158-b2f6-eace58027925\" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod \"pod-secrets-8fb73bbf-1718-4158-b2f6-eace58027925\" to be \"Succeeded or Failed\"",
    }
    expected pod "pod-secrets-8fb73bbf-1718-4158-b2f6-eace58027925" success: Gave up after waiting 5m0s for pod "pod-secrets-8fb73bbf-1718-4158-b2f6-eace58027925" to be "Succeeded or Failed"
occurred
test/e2e/framework/util.go:742
				
				Click to see stdout/stderrfrom junit_21.xml

Find pod-secrets-8fb73bbf-1718-4158-b2f6-eace58027925 mentions in log files | View test history on testgrid


Kubernetes e2e suite [sig-api-machinery] AdmissionWebhook [Privileged:ClusterAdmin] patching/updating a mutating webhook should work [Conformance] 5m5s

go run hack/e2e.go -v --test --test_args='--ginkgo.focus=Kubernetes\se2e\ssuite\s\[sig\-api\-machinery\]\sAdmissionWebhook\s\[Privileged\:ClusterAdmin\]\spatching\/updating\sa\smutating\swebhook\sshould\swork\s\[Conformance\]$'
test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:86
Feb 22 04:52:01.036: waiting for the deployment status valid%!(EXTRA string=k8s.gcr.io/e2e-test-images/agnhost:2.28, string=sample-webhook-deployment, string=webhook-1362)
Unexpected error:
    <*errors.errorString | 0xc00170b150>: {
        s: "error waiting for deployment \"sample-webhook-deployment\" status to match expectation: deployment status: v1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1.DeploymentCondition{v1.DeploymentCondition{Type:\"Available\", Status:\"False\", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:63749566019, loc:(*time.Location)(0x79034e0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:63749566019, loc:(*time.Location)(0x79034e0)}}, Reason:\"MinimumReplicasUnavailable\", Message:\"Deployment does not have minimum availability.\"}, v1.DeploymentCondition{Type:\"Progressing\", Status:\"True\", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:63749566019, loc:(*time.Location)(0x79034e0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:63749566019, loc:(*time.Location)(0x79034e0)}}, Reason:\"ReplicaSetUpdated\", Message:\"ReplicaSet \\\"sample-webhook-deployment-8977db\\\" is progressing.\"}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}",
    }
    error waiting for deployment "sample-webhook-deployment" status to match expectation: deployment status: v1.DeploymentStatus{ObservedGeneration:1, Replicas:1, UpdatedReplicas:1, ReadyReplicas:0, AvailableReplicas:0, UnavailableReplicas:1, Conditions:[]v1.DeploymentCondition{v1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Available", Status:"False", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:63749566019, loc:(*time.Location)(0x79034e0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:63749566019, loc:(*time.Location)(0x79034e0)}}, Reason:"MinimumReplicasUnavailable", Message:"Deployment does not have minimum availability."}, v1.DeploymentCondition{Type:"Progressing", Status:"True", LastUpdateTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:63749566019, loc:(*time.Location)(0x79034e0)}}, LastTransitionTime:v1.Time{Time:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:63749566019, loc:(*time.Location)(0x79034e0)}}, Reason:"ReplicaSetUpdated", Message:"ReplicaSet \"sample-webhook-deployment-8977db\" is progressing."}}, CollisionCount:(*int32)(nil)}
occurred
test/e2e/apimachinery/webhook.go:845